Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The EX-FS10 was brought out 8 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma Quattro

 EX-FS10 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-FS10

 Quattro EX-FS10 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016January 2009Newer by 86 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1620k230kCrisper display (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro

 EX-FS10 Quattro 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the Quattro.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Quattro is 96 and 63 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and Quattro.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will deliver greater detail having its extra 20MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Portrait photography features
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography features
25
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
81
you can focus manually
megapixel count great (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Street photography highlights
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
more heavy than others (625 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Sports photography camera
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
70
megapixel count great (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
supports phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames/s)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Travel photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Travel photography highlights
51
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
55
environment proofing
megapixel count great (29 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (625 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography information
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography information
26
focusing manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse function
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
megapixel count great (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
no image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-FS10
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
22
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
22
comes with face detection focus
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video ( pxls)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than others (625 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Sigma sd Quattro
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-01-08 2016-02-23
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Amount of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 121 grams (0.27 lbs) 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 BP-61
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $200 $738