Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0193b60bb5af18fb50aecee2d917106dd57089" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-FS10 was brought out 8 years prior to the Quattro which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-FS10 scores vs the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma Quattro
EX-FS10 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-FS10
Quattro | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 86 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro
EX-FS10 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db7a9/db7a9aa5fe911da4a097c16ef5b9e5074d5f29fa" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Quattro is 96 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b96d/4b96df6a08b51cb1f112acd7af6deb17fb2fec88" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and Quattro.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will deliver greater detail having its extra 20MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fde27/fde271d994f94e51de3de6461eff8b09dbb73a30" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e403/4e40341efca15b2e1fe37c12c2b8dbf488ec15c8" alt="Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $200 | $738 |