Clicky

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Casio EX-FS10
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
  • 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro H, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-FS10 was brought out 8 years before the Quattro H which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-FS10 grades against the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sigma Quattro H

 EX-FS10 Quattro H 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-FS10

 Quattro H EX-FS10 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2009Newer by 86 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1620k230kClearer display (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro H

 EX-FS10 Quattro H 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 offers outer measurements of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 and the Quattro H.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and Quattro H is 96 and 78 respectively.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The image underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FS10 and Quattro H.

Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-FS10 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will provide more detail having its extra 36MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-FS10
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro H
25
manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
83
focusing manually
great MP (45MP)
nice sensor size (APS-H)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Street photography features
Sigma Quattro H Street photography features
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
70
nice sensor size (APS-H)
supports RAW files
environment proof
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-FS10
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro H
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
71
great MP (45 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-H)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-FS10
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro H
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
65
environment proof
great MP (45 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Landscape photography info
Sigma Quattro H Landscape photography info
26
manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
75
focusing manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
great MP (45 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-H)
supports RAW files
environment proof
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 Vlogging advice
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging advice
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
26
provides face detect autofocus
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video ( resolution)
lack of microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FS10 and Sigma Quattro H
 Casio Exilim EX-FS10Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Company Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-FS10 Sigma sd Quattro H
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-01-08 2016-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-H
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 45MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3456 x 2592 6200 x 4152
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.9-7.1 -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.4
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.8 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 -
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121 gr (0.27 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 BP-61
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $200 $1,134