Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26

/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Announced July 2018

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sony RX100 VA, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the EX-FS10 (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") offer different sensor sizing.

The EX-FS10 was brought out 10 years before the RX100 VA which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-FS10 matches up versus the RX100 VA in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sony RX100 VA
EX-FS10 | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Casio EX-FS10
RX100 VA | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2018 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 115 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony RX100 VA
EX-FS10 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FS10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FS10 versus Sony RX100 VA in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FS10 compared to the RX100 VA.
-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FS10 and RX100 VA is 96 and 89 respectively.
-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FS10 and RX100 VA.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-FS10 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 VA will render greater detail having its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FS10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
-screen-back-comparison.jpg)

Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 24.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 299 grams (0.66 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $200 | $998 |