Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10/Casio-EX-FS10-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W220/Sony-W220-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony W220, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FS10 (9MP) and W220 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FS10 was released within a month of the W220 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-FS10 matches up against the W220 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FS10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FS10 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Sony W220
EX-FS10 | W220 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Casio EX-FS10
W220 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony W220
EX-FS10 | W220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2009 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FS10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony W220 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FS10 and Sony W220 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FS10 against the W220.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W220-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FS10 and W220 is 96 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W220-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FS10 and W220.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony W220 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W220-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FS10-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W220-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FS10 vs Sony W220 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-7.1 | f/2.8-7.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 147 gr (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $200 | $160 |