Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
61 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-G1 was unveiled 4 years prior to the Fujifilm S8200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-G1 grades vs the Fujifilm S8200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Fujifilm FinePix S8200. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Fujifilm S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Fujifilm S8200
| EX-G1 | Fujifilm S8200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Casio EX-G1
| Fujifilm S8200 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 38 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Fujifilm S8200
| EX-G1 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 enjoys external dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8200 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the Fujifilm S8200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and Fujifilm S8200 is 94 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and Fujifilm S8200.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-11-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-960mm (40.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 0cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lbs) | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $61 | $450 |