Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d72ba/d72baa7e900476652f0268975a9eaa6179bd2401" alt="Casio Exilim EX-G1 front Casio Exilim EX-G1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2c0/da2c07f0dfe5c264fe8f9886b1e21b4e9c9834b5" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released April 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-G1 versus Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the EX-G1 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-G1 was unveiled 16 months earlier than the Fujifilm Z900EXR making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-G1 matches up vs the Fujifilm Z900EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
EX-G1 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Casio EX-G1
Fujifilm Z900EXR | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 16 months |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Fujifilm Z900EXR
EX-G1 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-G1 versus Fujifilm Z900EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the Fujifilm Z900EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cba/e0cba213e29afb87b9fcf10a0965970c487ca605" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR size comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19793/19793c223650db4ba42d85133bbef37297f7e79a" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR top view buttons comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and Fujifilm Z900EXR.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-G1 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d67c9/d67c91de082c091086a1678298fe8203cb9be54a" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR sensor size comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43674/436742fb9af8a5c2b4eafa0062ef1f82d62154ac" alt="Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-G1 vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-11-18 | 2011-04-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.9-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.40 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lbs) | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-800 | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $61 | $380 |