Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-G1 versus Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-G1 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-G1 was launched 11 months after the M320 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-G1 matches up against the M320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Kodak M320
| EX-G1 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2009 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-G1
| M320 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M320
| EX-G1 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-G1 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-G1 versus Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-G1 versus the M320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and M320 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and M320.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-G1 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Casio EX-G1 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-G1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-11-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 gr (0.34 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $61 | $39 |