Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
Casio EX-G1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Introduced November 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Photography Glossary Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-G1 was announced within a month of the M575 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-G1 grades versus the M575 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Kodak M575
| EX-G1 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-G1
| M575 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575
| EX-G1 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-G1 enjoys physical dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-G1 versus the M575.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and M575 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and M575.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak M575 to give you more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Street photography details
Kodak M575 Street photography details
environment proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (154g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
low max ISO (1,000)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Sports photography info
Kodak M575 Sports photography info
environment proof
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-G1
Travel photography with Kodak M575
environment proof
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (154 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (152 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Landscape photography details
Kodak M575 Landscape photography details
you can focus manually
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3")
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
has no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-G1 Vlogging advice
Kodak M575 Vlogging advice
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (154 grams)
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-11-18 | 2010-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $61 | $139 |