Clicky

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
16
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-G1 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio EX-G1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
  • Introduced November 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-G1 was announced within a month of the M575 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-G1 grades versus the M575 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Kodak M575

 EX-G1 M575 
Manual focus Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-G1

 M575 EX-G1 
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575

 EX-G1 M575 
LaunchedNovember 2009January 2010Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-G1 enjoys physical dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-G1 versus the M575.

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and M575 is 94 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and M575.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak M575 to give you more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively.

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
27
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Street photography details
Kodak M575 Street photography details
53
environment proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (154g)
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
low max ISO (1,000)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Sports photography info
Kodak M575 Sports photography info
23
environment proof
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
26
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-G1
Travel photography with Kodak M575
54
environment proof
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (154 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
68
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (152 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Landscape photography details
Kodak M575 Landscape photography details
31
you can focus manually
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
40
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3")
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
has no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Vlogging advice
Kodak M575 Vlogging advice
22
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (154 grams)
28
pretty wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (152g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-G1 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-G1 and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim EX-G1Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-G1 Kodak EasyShare M575
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-11-18 2010-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1000
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.4 -
Macro focusing range 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.40 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 154 gr (0.34 lbs) 152 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-800 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $61 $139