Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-G1 was manufactured 5 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-G1 matches up against the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Olympus TG-3
| EX-G1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-G1
| TG-3 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Olympus TG-3
| EX-G1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-G1 provides outer dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-G1 vs the TG-3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and TG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and TG-3.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to give you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-G1 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-11-18 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-800 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $61 | $350 |