Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-G1 was revealed 7 months prior to the CX3 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-G1 grades against the CX3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-G1 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-G1
| CX3 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-G1 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 provides physical dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-G1 vs the CX3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and CX3 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and CX3.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-G1 to provide greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-11-18 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-800 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $61 | $329 |