Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh G900, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and G900 (20MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-G1 was unveiled 9 years prior to the G900 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-G1 scores vs the G900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Ricoh G900. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh G900
| EX-G1 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-G1
| G900 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 100 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh G900
| EX-G1 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 has got outside dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh G900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-G1 versus the G900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and G900.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh G900 to render more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh G900 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $61 | $752 |