Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh GR
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the EX-G1 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-G1 was unveiled 6 years before the GR II which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-G1 matches up versus the GR II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Ricoh GR II. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh GR II
EX-G1 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Casio EX-G1
GR II | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | November 2009 | More modern by 67 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh GR II
EX-G1 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-G1 offers outer measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh GR II has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-G1 against the GR II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and GR II is 94 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The picture below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and GR II.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-G1 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR II will give extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-11-18 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.40 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lbs) | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-800 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $61 | $599 |