Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-G1 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-20 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-G1 matches up versus the WG-20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-G1 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-G1
| WG-20 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 51 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-G1 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 enjoys outer measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WG-20.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and WG-20 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and WG-20.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-800 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $61 | $370 |
