Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-G1 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-20 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-G1 matches up versus the WG-20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-G1 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-G1
| WG-20 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 51 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-G1 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 enjoys outer measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WG-20.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and WG-20 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and WG-20.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-800 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $61 | $370 |