Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-G1 was launched 8 years before the WG-50 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-G1 matches up against the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-G1 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-G1
| WG-50 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 91 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-G1 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 provides outside dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WG-50.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WG-50 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and WG-50.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-G1 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-800 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $61 | $280 |