Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-6, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-G1 was introduced 9 years prior to the WG-6 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-G1 scores versus the WG-6 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Ricoh WG-6. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-G1 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-G1
| WG-6 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | November 2009 | Newer by 100 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-G1 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 has external dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WG-6.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and WG-6 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to deliver extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 246g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $61 | $271 |