Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-G1 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-G1 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-G1 scores against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-G1 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-G1
| WG-M1 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | November 2009 | Fresher by 58 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-G1 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-G1 enjoys exterior measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-G1 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-G1 and the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and WG-M1.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-800 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $61 | $2,000 |