Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung HZ35W, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-G1 was unveiled 7 months prior to the HZ35W and they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-G1 scores against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-G1 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-G1
| HZ35W | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-G1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 features external measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-G1 and HZ35W.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of images although you should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-G1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-800 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $61 | $300 |
