Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung MV800, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-G1 was manufactured 21 months earlier than the MV800 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-G1 matches up versus the MV800 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-G1 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-G1
| MV800 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 21 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung MV800
| EX-G1 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-G1 offers physical dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has sizing of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-G1 and the MV800.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and MV800 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and MV800.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung MV800 to render greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-G1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung MV800 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-11-18 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $61 | $499 |