Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-G1 was unveiled 11 months after the SL102 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-G1 matches up against the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-G1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2009 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-G1
| SL102 | EX-G1 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung SL102
| EX-G1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Identical screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-G1 features external dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-G1 against the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and SL102.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-G1 to give you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher EX-G1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $61 | $130 |