Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung SL202, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-G1 was launched 10 months after the SL202 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-G1 grades against the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-G1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2009 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 10 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-G1
| SL202 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung SL202
| EX-G1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 offers exterior dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-G1 vs the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and SL202 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specifications. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and SL202.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-G1 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-G1 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung SL202 |
| Alternative name | - | PL50 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-11-18 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 gr (0.34 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $61 | $140 |