Clicky

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
16
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-G1 front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Casio EX-G1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
  • Released November 2009
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL65
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

The EX-G1 was introduced 10 months after the SL620 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-G1 grades versus the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung SL620

 EX-G1 SL620 
ReleasedNovember 2009February 2009Newer by 10 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-G1

 SL620 EX-G1 
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung SL620

 EX-G1 SL620 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-G1 comes with outside measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-G1 versus the SL620.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and SL620 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-G1 and SL620.

As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-G1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Portrait photography advice
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography advice
27
you can focus manually
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
26
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Street Comparison

Casio EX-G1 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Street photography camera
53
environment proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competitors (154g)
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than average (168 grams)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-G1
Sports photography with Samsung SL620
23
environment proofing
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
slow fps (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
17
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Travel photography information
Samsung SL620 Travel photography information
54
environment proofing
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (154 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (168g)
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Landscape photography information
Samsung SL620 Landscape photography information
31
you can focus manually
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
23
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Vlogging features
Samsung SL620 Vlogging features
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (154g)
24
comes with face detection focus
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic support
heavier than average (168g)
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-G1 and Samsung SL620
 Casio Exilim EX-G1Samsung SL620
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-G1 Samsung SL620
Otherwise known as - PL65
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-11-18 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 154g (0.34 pounds) 168g (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-800 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $61 $200