Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-G1 was announced 3 years earlier than the WB150F and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-G1 scores vs the WB150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-G1 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB150F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | November 2009 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-G1 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-G1 comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WB150F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WB150F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and WB150F.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB150F to resolve greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-G1 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-800 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $61 | $230 |