Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-G1 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very close and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-G1 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WB250F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-G1 matches up vs the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-G1 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB250F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 38 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-G1 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 has physical measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-G1 compared to the WB250F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and WB250F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and WB250F.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-11-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 154 gr (0.34 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $61 | $250 |
