Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung WB30F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-G1 was introduced 4 years before the WB30F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-G1 matches up vs the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-G1 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB30F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | November 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-G1 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-G1 offers outer dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") and a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-G1 versus the WB30F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to result in more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 128g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $61 | $180 |