Clicky

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
16
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-G1 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Casio EX-G1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
  • Launched November 2009
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Released January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-G1 was introduced 5 years before the WB350F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-G1 matches up against the WB350F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB350F

 EX-G1 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-G1

 WB350F EX-G1 
ReleasedJanuary 2014November 2009More recent by 50 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB350F

 EX-G1 WB350F 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-G1 comes with physical measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-G1 versus the WB350F.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-G1 and WB350F.

As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to offer you more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The older EX-G1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography information
27
focusing manually
no manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
40
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Street photography details
Samsung WB350F Street photography details
53
environment sealing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (154 grams)
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (276g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-G1
Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
23
environment sealing
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB350F Travel photography advice
54
environment sealing
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (154 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
69
lighter than competitors (276g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography highlights
31
focusing manually
environment sealing
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
50
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-G1 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB350F Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (154g)
34
reasonably wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (276 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB350F
 Casio Exilim EX-G1Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-G1 Samsung WB350F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-11-18 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-114mm (3.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1250 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.40 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 154g (0.34 pounds) 276g (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-800 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $61 $260