Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27


91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung WB850F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-G1 was launched 3 years earlier than the WB850F which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-G1 matches up against the WB850F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-G1 and Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB850F
EX-G1 | WB850F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-G1
WB850F | EX-G1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 26 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB850F
EX-G1 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 has outside dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-G1 versus Samsung WB850F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-G1 against the WB850F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-G1 and WB850F is 94 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-G1 and WB850F.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB850F to offer more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB850F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-800 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $61 | $599 |