Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200
94 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-G1 and Sony H200, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-G1 was revealed 4 years prior to the H200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-G1 grades against the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Sony H200
| EX-G1 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Casio EX-G1
| H200 | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 38 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Sony H200
| EX-G1 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-G1 comes with exterior measurements of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-G1 and Sony H200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-G1 against the H200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-G1 and H200 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-G1 and H200.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony H200 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-G1 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-11-18 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154 grams (0.34 lbs) | 530 grams (1.17 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery format | - | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-800 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $61 | $250 |