Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-H10 versus Casio EX-Z2000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Casio. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the EX-Z2000 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was revealed 6 months before the EX-Z2000 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H10 scores versus the EX-Z2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Casio Exilim EX-Z2000. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-H10 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-H10
| EX-Z2000 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-H10 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z2000 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H10 versus Casio EX-Z2000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the EX-Z2000.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and EX-Z2000 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and EX-Z2000.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-Z2000 to give extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-110 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $0 |