Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-H10 versus Casio EX-ZR300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Casio. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H10 was manufactured 3 years prior to the EX-ZR300 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-H10 matches up against the EX-ZR300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| EX-H10 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Casio EX-H10
| EX-ZR300 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 35 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Casio EX-ZR300
| EX-H10 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR300 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 versus Casio EX-ZR300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 versus the EX-ZR300.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and EX-ZR300 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and EX-ZR300.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to give you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2012-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $329 |