Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Casio. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H10 was brought out 5 years before the EX-ZR800 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H10 grades against the EX-ZR800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-ZR800
EX-H10 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Casio EX-H10
EX-ZR800 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | June 2009 | Newer by 50 months | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Casio EX-ZR800
EX-H10 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR800 has dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H10 and the EX-ZR800.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and EX-ZR800 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The pic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and EX-ZR800.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to provide extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2013-08-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $300 | $429 |