Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-H10 and FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H10 was announced at a similar time to the S200EXR and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 scores vs the S200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-H10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-H10
| S200EXR | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-H10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 and FujiFilm S200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 versus the S200EXR.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and S200EXR is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and S200EXR.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-H10 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher.
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also Known as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 7.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 865 grams (1.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-140 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $500 |