Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-H10 and FujiFilm S200EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") have totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H10 was announced at a similar time to the S200EXR and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 scores vs the S200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-H10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-H10
| S200EXR | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-H10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 and FujiFilm S200EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 versus the S200EXR.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and S200EXR is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and S200EXR.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-H10 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher.
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also Known as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 7.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 865 grams (1.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-140 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $500 |