Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is fairly close but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was launched 2 months after the Fujifilm F200EXR and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-H10 scores against the Fujifilm F200EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-H10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-H10
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-H10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2009 |  | April 2009 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 has exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H10 and the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The EX-H10 has got the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field more difficult.
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2009-04-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $350 |
