Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-H10 versus Fujifilm F900EXR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") use totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-H10 was launched 4 years earlier than the Fujifilm F900EXR which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-H10 scores against the Fujifilm F900EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-H10 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Casio EX-H10
Fujifilm F900EXR | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm F900EXR
EX-H10 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has got external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 versus Fujifilm F900EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the Fujifilm F900EXR.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-H10 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | EXR II |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $380 |