Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Announced June 2009
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview

Below is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-H10 was brought out 5 years earlier than the Fujifilm S9200 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 grades against the Fujifilm S9200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Fujifilm S9200

 EX-H10 Fujifilm S9200 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-H10

 Fujifilm S9200 EX-H10 
LaunchedJanuary 2014June 2009More recent by 55 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm S9200

 EX-H10 Fujifilm S9200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S9200 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 vs the Fujifilm S9200.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and Fujifilm S9200 is 93 and 61 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and Fujifilm S9200.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S9200 to render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography information
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography information
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
36
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-H10
Street photography with Fujifilm S9200
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competitors (670g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Sports photography advice
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography advice
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery (500 shots)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Travel photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Travel photography camera
57
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
54
great battery (500 CIPA)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (670g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography advice
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography advice
41
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
44
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery (500 per charge)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-H10
Vlogging with Fujifilm S9200
28
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
26
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (670g)
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm S9200
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Fujifilm FinePix S9200
General Information
Company Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-H10 Fujifilm FinePix S9200
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-06-11 2014-01-06
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing distance 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 97 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1700 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.60 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194g (0.43 pounds) 670g (1.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 500 photographs
Battery format - AA
Battery ID NP-90 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $300 $300