Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Casio EX-H10 versus Fujifilm XP200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H10 was introduced 4 years prior to the Fujifilm XP200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the Fujifilm XP200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Fujifilm XP200
| EX-H10 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Casio EX-H10
| Fujifilm XP200 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 | June 2009 | Newer by 46 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Fujifilm XP200
| EX-H10 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Fujifilm XP200 has measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Fujifilm XP200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 and the Fujifilm XP200.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and Fujifilm XP200 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and Fujifilm XP200.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to show more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H10 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2013-03-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $300 | $250 |