Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
![Casio Exilim EX-H10 front Casio Exilim EX-H10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport/Kodak-Sport-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak Sport, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the Sport (12MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H10 was released 19 months earlier than the Sport making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-H10 scores versus the Sport when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Kodak EasyShare Sport. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Kodak Sport
EX-H10 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 112k | Sharper display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Casio EX-H10
Sport | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2009 | More recent by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak Sport
EX-H10 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has sizing of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 and Kodak Sport in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 vs the Sport.
![Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and Sport is 93 and 92 respectively.
![Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and Sport.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you will need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H10 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 112k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $155 |