Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Nikon A900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Nikon. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and A900 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was revealed 7 years before the A900 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-H10 scores vs the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Nikon A900
| EX-H10 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Casio EX-H10
| A900 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 81 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon A900
| EX-H10 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has got external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 versus Nikon A900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 against the A900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and A900 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and A900.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon A900 to offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $400 |