Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and S5200 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was launched 4 years earlier than the S5200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-H10 scores versus the S5200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Nikon Coolpix S5200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Nikon S5200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Nikon S5200
| EX-H10 | S5200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Casio EX-H10
| S5200 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | June 2009 | Newer by 44 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon S5200
| EX-H10 | S5200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Nikon S5200 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the S5200.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and S5200 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and S5200.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S5200 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S5200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix S5200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-156mm (6.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 146 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $130 |