Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Released July 2012
- Succeeded the Nikon S9100
- Renewed by Nikon S9500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and S9300 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H10 was brought out 4 years before the S9300 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-H10 grades vs the S9300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Nikon Coolpix S9300. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Nikon S9300
| EX-H10 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Casio EX-H10
| S9300 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2012 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Nikon S9300
| EX-H10 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9300 has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-H10 and the S9300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and S9300 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The picture below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and S9300.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S9300 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2012-07-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 6.9fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 215g (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $249 |