Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H10 was unveiled around the same time to the FE-5020 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the FE-5020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-H10 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-H10
| FE-5020 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-H10 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the FE-5020.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and FE-5020 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and FE-5020.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you should expect similar quality of files although you have to factor the production date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called as | - | X-935 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $160 |