Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was brought out 3 years earlier than the SZ-12 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-H10 scores against the SZ-12 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus SZ-12. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus SZ-12
| EX-H10 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Casio EX-H10
| SZ-12 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus SZ-12
| EX-H10 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-12 has sizing of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the SZ-12.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and SZ-12 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and SZ-12.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SZ-12 to offer you extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus SZ-12 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $350 |