Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H10 was released 4 years before the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-H10 grades vs the TG-630 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
EX-H10 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
TG-630 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | June 2009 | More modern by 43 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
EX-H10 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and TG-630 iHS is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images though you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $200 |