Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was unveiled 3 years prior to the TG-810 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-H10 matches up against the TG-810 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-H10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-H10
| TG-810 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 26 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-H10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 offers external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 against the TG-810.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and TG-810 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and TG-810.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-810 to show extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $428 |