Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was announced 5 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 scores vs the TG-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-H10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
| TG-2 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-H10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 vs the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and TG-2 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specs. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you should really factor the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-H10 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $300 | $380 |