Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was introduced 3 years earlier than the VR-340 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the VR-340 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus VR-340
| EX-H10 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-H10
| VR-340 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus VR-340
| EX-H10 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 offers outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 versus the VR-340.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and VR-340.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $130 |