Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was brought out 19 months earlier than the XZ-1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus XZ-1
| EX-H10 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Casio EX-H10
| XZ-1 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 19 months |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-1
| EX-H10 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 has got external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the XZ-1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and XZ-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The graphic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and XZ-1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H10 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-H10 will show more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $300 | $567 |