Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Here is a extended review of the Casio EX-H10 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Pentax. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-3 GPS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-H10 scores versus the WG-3 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
EX-H10 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Casio EX-H10
WG-3 GPS | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | June 2009 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
EX-H10 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 has exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 and the WG-3 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and WG-3 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and WG-3 GPS.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-06-11 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 238g (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $350 |