Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched November 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-H10 versus Ricoh CX6, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the CX6 (10MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was announced 3 years before the CX6 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-H10 matches up against the CX6 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh CX6. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh CX6
| EX-H10 | CX6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Casio EX-H10
| CX6 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2011 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 29 months |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh CX6
| EX-H10 | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX6 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Ricoh CX6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the CX6.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and CX6 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The picture below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and CX6.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H10 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh CX6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2011-11-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $595 |
