Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was launched 3 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-H10 grades vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-H10 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-H10
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | June 2009 | More recent by 32 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-H10 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 93 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H10 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $871 |