Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H10 was launched 5 years before the WG-20 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-H10 grades against the WG-20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh WG-20. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-H10 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-20 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 56 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-H10 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 features outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-20 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WG-20.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and WG-20 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and WG-20.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-20 to resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 164 grams (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $370 |